Difference between revisions of "Talk:Skill Cards"
From WildWords
Alexayerdi (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* Same thing here, I don't think you should link to the class types within WildWords. You should have them link to their descriptions on the gymnastics website or something. They are specific to the gymnastics realm, not WildWords. [[User:Alexayerdi|Alexayerdi]] ([[User talk:Alexayerdi|talk]]) 10:20, 4 June 2015 (CDT) | * Same thing here, I don't think you should link to the class types within WildWords. You should have them link to their descriptions on the gymnastics website or something. They are specific to the gymnastics realm, not WildWords. [[User:Alexayerdi|Alexayerdi]] ([[User talk:Alexayerdi|talk]]) 10:20, 4 June 2015 (CDT) | ||
| + | **I was considering those terms to be part of the Chandler speech community that could be added at a later date. No other gyms use those specific terms in the same way, so they are part of the chandler speech community's vocabulary. Do you think I should still remove the internal link? I won't be able to add an external link cause the Chandler website doesn't have descriptions of its classes[[User:Trst|Trst]] ([[User talk:Trst|talk]]) 12:37, 4 June 2015 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:37, 4 June 2015
- Same thing here, I don't think you should link to the class types within WildWords. You should have them link to their descriptions on the gymnastics website or something. They are specific to the gymnastics realm, not WildWords. Alexayerdi (talk) 10:20, 4 June 2015 (CDT)
- I was considering those terms to be part of the Chandler speech community that could be added at a later date. No other gyms use those specific terms in the same way, so they are part of the chandler speech community's vocabulary. Do you think I should still remove the internal link? I won't be able to add an external link cause the Chandler website doesn't have descriptions of its classesTrst (talk) 12:37, 4 June 2015 (CDT)
